Hi,
Please check below links. These should be useful.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-48399
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sfin100/helpdata/en/b7/7dd1538cdf4608e10000000a174cb4/frameset.htm
Regards,
Gaurav
Hi,
Please check below links. These should be useful.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-48399
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sfin100/helpdata/en/b7/7dd1538cdf4608e10000000a174cb4/frameset.htm
Regards,
Gaurav
Hi Soumya,
EA-PS activation means that you will activate PSM-FM (funds management).
After activated, it cannot be deactivated anymore.
This activation impacts ALL other modules (FI, CO, MM, PM, SD, Payroll and so on) and should be considered a project. Basically impacts any component that at the end generates a FI document.
It is a complex implementation and must be carefully planned together with the responsible from the other areas such as FI, CO and MM.
See my documents and answers below about this matter:
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-63614
Activation of Funds Management | SCN
Company Code Assignment to a Funds Management Area - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki
Definition of Leading Ledger for Public Sector Customers - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki
I hope this helps.
Regards, Vanessa.
Dear Gurus,
I'm currently working on providing a solution for Internal Sales between divisions operating under the same company code. These divisions are profit centers and they are actually selling products, services and projects to each other. Now, we have created a Customer Account Group and Vendor Account Group for these divisions and I have strong doubts on the solution design, so I will propose the solution and I hope from the experts on the subject to have a look and give his/her feedback especially when it comes to the Reconciliation Account, handling of Inventory and the GL Entries created:
Prelims/Assumptions:
Sales Process:
Delivery: GL Entry @ Division AA: Dr. Cost of Goods Sold (P&L) 100 PC: AA
Cr. Inventory (Balance Sheet) 100 PC:AA
Billing: GL Entry @ Division AA: Dr. Inter Division Customer (BS) 120 PC: AA
Cr. Sales Revenue (P&L Account) 120 PC: AA
Goods Receipt: GL Entry @ Division BB: Dr. Inventory (BS) 120 PC: BB
Cr. Inter Division Vendor (BS) 120 PC: AA
(Ignore the standard Goods Receipt and Invoice Verification process done by Division BB involving the GR/IR Account which will be closed eventually. The impact eventually will be the same as above)
Note: Once this is happening the Inventory BS Account balance is now 120. And accordingly, the moving average for the Material is 120 for the 1 unit. Is this right from an Accounting perspective? Material Valuation has increased by 20 for the material due to Internal Purchase. PC AA has incurred a Profit of 20 USD.
At this stage: GL Entry @ Division BB: No Entry created except when selling to an external customer. Assuming Division BB sold the material to an external customer for this unit at 150 USD, the following will be GL Entries:
Delivery: Dr. COGS (P&L) 120 PC: BB
Cr. Inventory (BS) 120 PC: BB
Billing: Dr. Customer (BS) 150 PC: BB
Cr. Sales Revenue (P&L) 150 PC: BB
Now, here's my real inquiries:
Let me know your thoughts and please give me your inputs. I will also share this solution with other experts and I know that it might be Accounting relevant inquiry but I brought to you an Integration Scenario and we should be tackling integrated scenarios rather than isolated processes.
Thanks. I'm looking forward for an expert feedback.
Reda
Hi Gurus,
We are performing Inter unit Elimination of sales , using CX20 , Data consolidation monitor .
All the consolidation units Elimination is happening , except for the couple of CU's which we named
as CUXX1 and CUXX2 , is not happening .
Even I tried in CX54 , by giving only the consolidation group , these two CU's are left out (CUXX1 and CUXX2)
I checked the CXE7 and checked my method for Elimination of Revenue and expenses (Z300)
noted the set name (INTCSC) and checked the FS items in gs03 all are maintained correctly.
Just to make sure was really entries are posted in GL , which I saw through FS10N and they are existing
for the relevant account (Inter company sales a/c) for both company codes XX1 and XX2.
Also I want to highlight in CXE7 , for the method Z300 ( Elim. IU revenue and expense) the parameter
one sided elimination is checked and post to the initiating cons unit is also checked.
Can you let me know if I have missed out any steps of configuration in this .
I got to know from the user in 2014 it was working rightly, but in 2015 this is not working for the past 4 months .
Anand
Hello Srikanth,
Normally, Open Items like Invoices are assigned to Profit Center arriving from SD for example assuming master data for materials are assigned to Profit Centers. When we Pay these invoices, we have the option of clearing these invoices. Now, the Profit Centers under Document Splitting in New GL perform the Document Splitting on the GL Accounts level, not on the Sub-Ledger level. For this reason, you won't find Profit Centers in the Customer Line Items or Vendor Line Items.
Profit centers are P&L oriented rather than balance sheet oriented. So, in the Entry view of the Journal Entries, you find the Profit Center on the Revenue line not on the Customer line, while when you run the General Ledger view, you find the Profit Center inherited on the Customer Recon GL Account.
Now, when you Clear documents such as Payments for Invoices, we end up with generic profit center or dummy profit center based on the configuration because both sides are Balance Sheet accounts.
Our solution to overcome this issue, we have made an ABAP intervention to update the Profit Center in the Customer Line items and accordingly, the Profit Centers were being cleared properly. I hope my answer has been helpful.
Thanks.
Reda
Hello Daniel,
You should be using FTR03 (the BOE used for Turkey, Greece.) and during the Clear at Bank step, it will post two GL Entries:
1. Debit: Bank Main Account
Credit: Bank Clearing Account (transitory)
2. Debit: Provision for Uncollectible Checks
Credit: Customer Special GL Inidcator
Thanks.
Hi Reda,
Thanks for your response, so ABAP intervention is the only option? no SAP standard procedure to handle this scenario? btw I contacted SAP and they said the system is behaving the way it should. Not only FB1D(F-32) the system will behave the same for FB1K, FB1S and FBRA transactions which are defined in the standard table T8G10. When the document split has these transactions the split will be based on the above transaction types and Variant not from the Document type (Active method).
Thanks!
Srikanth
Hi Sanil,
I will check into that.
We also decided to archive table BSAD. This should also help with the issue.
Sincerely,
Judy Ortscheid
Hello Arabinda,
Greetings. I will assume that you're not using GTS. In the Purchase Order, the Condition type can be configured as Delivery Costs-condition category. This allows the Vendor on the condition level to be modifiable. On the Purchase Order, we deal with the Goods Vendor as the main vendor, however in the case of LCs, we are dealing with multiple vendors serving the Foreign PO. Therefore, we modify the Vendor on the pricing conditions related to different vendors like Shipping Vendor, Bank Vendor, Insurance Vendor, Customs vendor.
During MIRO, you select the Planned Delivery Costs:
Accordingly, you will be able to process the Bank Vendor dues by which it creates the following entry:
Debit: GR/IR or Accrual LC Bills Acct.
Credit: Bank Vendor Account
When, we payback the Bank:
Debit: Bank Vendor Account
Credit: Main Bank Account
Hello,
Could anyone please explain me the basics of the flow of documents in SD that have a financial impact? I appreciate a lot your help. Thanks
Hi Arturo,
2 times you have the financial impact.
1 at the time of PGI (Post Goods Issue.)
2 At the time of billing.
Hope thats helps
Regards,
Nas
Sales Flow Starts from Business to Business
1 Inquiry - No financial Impact.
2. Quotation - No financial Impact.
3. Contract - No Financial Impact.
4. Scheduling Agr.- No Financial Impact.
5. Sales Order - Financial impact on Credit Limit if in Config.
6. Delivery - Financial Impact on Credit Limit if in Config, +Postal Charges+Other Charges if
in Config.
7 Post good Issue - If Material is Valuated with value , it will post financial entry COGS vs Stock Account.
8. Shipment - if shipment is connected with Shipment cost Creation, Financial Impact may by Service entry Sheet.
9. Billing - Customer Debit, Credit Revenue , Charges Tax , Accural Rebates can happen.
If Proforma Invoice no Financial Impact.
10 Excise Invoice (Country India Version) - Excise Values impact on FI.
Credit Memo - to credit customer has financial impact
Debit Memo - to Debit Customer has financial Impact.
Return Billing - Like material Return with Credit to Customer.
hi, i am facing same problem, entries are hitting in PLA register instead of RG23A
please guide me for this issue.
We have the old version of AR interest charges, and see that there is a new program RFINTITAR and transaction FINT that we would like to implement. Does anyone have experience with implementing this program and/or recommendations for obtaining outside resources who have experience implementing? Would appreciate any feedback. Thanks.
Hi Experts,
I have a requirement of making an exclusion in WHT calculation using derivation rule. In the derivation using configuration, the origin fields are not sufficient for me to put the derivation logic. So I have to use the enhancement using Badi: WT_EXCLUSIOS_CUST_EXIT
Has anyone worked on this?
Thanks in advance
Hi Frns,
im facing difficulty in understanding foreign currency translation concept & execution..could someone plz help me
plz find the parameters below
Doc currency -GBP
Local currency -USD
Group currency -EUR
1) i have maintained a foreign currency Balance sheet account (Loan accnt in GBP) & a foreign currency vendor (GBP) - made postings in the the mid of the month in GBP currency ....values got updated in transaction currency (GBP) ,Local currency (USD) and Group currency (EUR) -on the base of spot rates defined for that posting date
2)During month end ,i ran FAGL_FC_VAL -exchange rate diff got posted to unrealized exchange rate loss/gain accnts and valuation adj account in both local currency as well as group currency as per the month end spot rates.
3) My reporting currency in financial statement is group currency(EUR)
As per my knowledge , translation is to translate the local currency into group currency....when i performed step 2 ..values got updated into group currency....my question is when and where we exactly perform FAGL_FC_TRANS ...
could someone plz help me in uderstnding the translation concept with examples....appreciate your help..
Thanks,
Suresh
Hi Miriam,
Por Journal Entries (Pólizas) it's PL, please see below the naming convention for all cases (so far)
Hope it helps,
Marcos
Dear Daniele,
I am sorry that I cannot provide a more favorable reply as this is standard system design.
Regards,
Monika
AIM,
At OBQ1 you can check the calculation procedure. Please check the condition class, type and the calculation type. Condition type JAIQ and calculation type C may solve the problem.
Regarding creating the the tax code use FTXP and assign it to the company code in table J_1ICONDTAX
Regards,
Dareal
Finally i gnerated a Valid XML for JE.
uff...
tomorrow post more details.
Thanks.