Try to switch off the message according to the OSS note 946235 - FF724, FF760, FF787 can be switched off
(note: this note is valid only for 600)
↧
Re: F-32 Error - FF724 Tax entry not possible in this item
↧
Accounting entries/process for Letter of Credit (Acounts Payable/Receivable)
Hi Experts,
My client is currently doing LC process in the following manner.
1. Bank makes payment to the vendor on the Due Date. Accounts Payable Team checks the bank statement online every day to view list of payments made to the vendor. Once payment appears in the bank statement, Accounts payable team enters the Vendor Payment in the Legacy system by debit to Bank Vendor Account and credit to Bank.
Bills Payable Account – Bank Dr
Bank Outgoing A/c Cr
But in SAP we can only select supplier vendor while in Goods receipt and in invoice receipt which will credit the vendor.
If we don't debit to the vendor at the time of making payment . Vendor credit balance will still be there.
To my understanding the vendor will be debited and credit to Bank while making payment.
What is the best practice if we should follow.
Waiting for you reply.
Thanks in Advance.
Arabinda
↧
↧
Re: Accounting entries/process for Letter of Credit (Acounts Payable/Receivable)
Arabinda,
Refer SAP note for the standard Letter of Credit Processing - SAP Library.
↧
Re: Payment Advice is not sent to few vendors in the payment run
Nisha,
Plz go back to the FBZP again and check the configs. Since its only affecting single Company Code then it might be there especially at the payment method and Forms in the paying company codes.
If its not there then kindly let us know.
↧
Assign scenarios and customer fields to ledgers AFTER go live
Hello,
My company has multiple company codes in Production system.
The Leading Ledger doesn’t have FIN_CCA Cost Center update in “Assign scenarios and customer fields to ledgers”.
We are going to go live with an additional Company Code. For the new company code we need Cost Center to be updated in FAGLFLEXT for the Leading Ledger, because we need cost center resolution in the reports that are based on FAGLFLEXT.
We are going to add FIN_CCA to the Leading ledger. That means that FAGLFLEXT will start subtotalling according to Cost Center (in addition to the fields assigned in the past) for all company codes.
My concern is whether adding a field to the Leading Ledger can cause any system errors / problems to the data of the company codes that are already live. (I’m aware that Cost Center will be populated for the new data only, no retroactive update).
Thank you in advance for sharing your expertise.
↧
↧
Substitution on Asset for using transaction AS02 /as92 to default the value by posting date
Can anyone help me know why these substitutions are used in Asset for the transaction codes when the T. code is AS02 /AS92 the posting date should be substituted.... What business scenarios these substitutions are used.
↧
Re: Main Bank GL
Hi,
Please check your configuration for Bank Statement under the below mentioned Nodes:
1. Bank Accounting>Business Transactions> Payment Transactions> Manual Bank Statement> Create and Assign Business Transactions
2. Bank Accounting> Business Transactions> Payment Transactions> Manual Bank Statement> Defile Posting Keys and Posting Rules for Bank Statement
Under this node check Define Posting Rules specifically.
Hope this will solve your issue.
Regards,
Afroz
↧
Re: new transaction for bank statement
Hi Paolo,
You can use Transaction code: FEBAN or FEBA_BANK_STATEMENT to post process the Bank Statement.
Regards,
Afroz
↧
Re: Substitution on Asset for using transaction AS02 /as92 to default the value by posting date
Hi Joyce,
Substitution is generally used in Asset Accounting for Mass Change of Assets Master Data.
For this you need to first create Substitution through T-code GGB1 and then assign the substitution in transaction code OA02.
Please refer the below link:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1250803
Regards,
Afroz
↧
↧
Re: F110 - FBZP Different paying entity according the payment method
Hi Priya,
Thanks for your answer,
I'll try it asap.
Regards,
Cédric
↧
Re: F110 - FBZP Different paying entity according the payment method
Hi Cedric,
I want to rephrase and understand your question in a simple way. Correct me if I’m wrong.
All Co.codes have payment method – A,B,C,D.
Local Paying Co.code XX should use only C,D
Universal paying co.code YY should NOT use C & D
Universal paying co.code YY should ONLY use Pymnt method –A,B
How to run APP according to above condition ?
Solution (My opinion)
Remove payment method C,D from paying co.code YY.
So Co.code YY can only pay invoices with payment method A,B
Invoice with payment method C,D of co.code (XX) will be paid by XX
Hope it’s clear.
Regards,
Sam
↧
Re: F110 - FBZP Different paying entity according the payment method
Hi Sam,
Sorry, I rephrase my question :
YY = All my scope Co. Codes
XX = A unique Co.codes which is in charge of the payment method C and D (interco Payments) on behalf of all the YY Co.Codes
All Co.codes have payment method – A,B,C,D
All Co.codes should be able to use payment method – A,B,C,D
For the payment methods C& D, XX must be the paying entities
For the payment methods A& B, YY must be the paying entities
Thank you very much for your help
Regards
Cédric
↧
Re: How to change default selected format for spreadsheet export.
Hi Suraj,
As per Mahip mentioned,That is Excel's issue,
e.g. 
the cell shown "####", to solve it, just turn you column width widely:
Hope you understand what I explain....
Rgds,
CHAN K S
↧
↧
Re: Main Bank GL
Hi Inayat,
Bank Main GL should be line item managed and not open item managed GL. The question of having Main Bank GL clearing does not seems correct.
Ideally while making F110 Payment & Bank Statement Posting following accounting entries are passed, which reflect Bank CIT Account clearing.
F110:
Vendor A/c. Dr.
To, Bank CIT A/c. Cr.
FF67 or FF.5
Bank CIT A/c. Dr.
To, Bank Main A/c.
As mentioned in the above entries Bank CIT account needs to be cleared on the base of Posting Rule Configuration.
Let me know the business case where you need Bank Main GL to be cleared. Thanks.
BR, Jaymin R. Bhatt
↧
Classical WHT - End to End scenario
Hi,
Can any one explain end to end Classical WHT scenario.
Regards,
Anu
↧
Pgm: RFDUZI00 - Finance Charges
Hi,
The business user ran program RFDUZI00 and the program crashed with a space issue:
"No more storage space available for extending an internal table".
Has anyone had this issue? I looked for SAP notes and found note 670117 which is for a NEW finance charge program, but it doesn't say anything about handling space issues.
If anyone has any information regarding this issue, please let me know.
Thanks,
Judy Ortscheid
↧
Values for Ordinary deprec. have changed in dep. area XX in fiscal year XXXX
Hi All,
I am getting message when I open asset in AW01N
"Values for Ordinary deprec. have changed in dep. area 01 in fiscal year 2015".
I understand that because depreciation term was changed since the last AFAR. so I executed AFAR for all depreciation area.
Now I again created new asset and posted acquisition. Again system is giving same message:
"Values for Ordinary deprec. have changed in dep. area 01 in fiscal year 2015"
What could be the reason?
Thanks in advance!!!
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava
↧
↧
Re: (MX) Contabilidad Electrónica - RME 2014 Anexo 24
Anyone verify correctly the JE XML File?
can share a sample of a XML File? if possible 1 sale and 1 payment with same date, and other with 1 sale and 1 payment different dates.
i have this sample(a non SAP system): http://api.ning.com/files/wyK9bAs*AkVcRNhqPGEu8*aTAUwvagPtAgRwVOIOerwO8yad9E7zwggw7mcUF9BmhEXQmKNQsoiUTKrX7JnMlS5-hTP-Ci…
Thanks.
↧
F-32 write off items belong to two different profit centers
Hi Friends,
We have document split active in new GL. In F-32 when writing off open items belonging to two different profit centers using AR reason code the postings are hitting dummy profit center. I understand that F-32 is a parameter transaction for FB1D which cannot be controlled by Active method of document split (where document type is used to control the split) it uses a passive split method which cannot be controlled using configuration. I am sure that every company has to go through this scenario where AR open items belong to different profit centers are write off in one transaction using different AR reason codes, I am just wondering how this scenario is handled in general (In companies where document split is active).
Thanks
Srikanth
↧
Re: Classical WHT - End to End scenario
Anu,
There are so many discussions on Withholding Tax in SCN. For instance http://scn.sap.com/thread/435148. However i am trying to give my prespective.
WHT are of two types
- Classical withholding tax: we calculate the WHT at the time of vendor payments.
- Extended Withholding Tax: The tax calculated at the time of invoice or payment whichever happens earlier. For this reason we have to create separate withholding tax types for invoice posting and payment posting.
Assuming that you are working under Indian Tax Jurisdiction, WHT (TDS) is deducted at the time of Invoice or Payment whichever is earlier. So when we make down payment to a vendor, we deduct the WHT at the time of payment itself. When the invoice is processed we will not deduct it again as we already deducted at the time of down payment.
- Configuration for Withholding Tax
SPRO- Financial Accounting- Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable-Business Transaction-Incoming invoices/credit memos- Carry out and check settings for withholding taxes.
1) Maintain tax codes In OBC7 maintain the withholding tax codes and their attributes like percentages and basis like gross or net etc.
2) Maintain the account determination for each and every tax codes through OBYS.
Note:
Withholding tax is Country specific and relevant for specific posting transactions in certain countries and even there, only for some groups of vendors. You therefore determine, depending on your company code, business partner, and the business transaction, the cases where withholding tax become relevant.
3) Maintain the country keys (The standard system delivers most of the countries forms to be submitted to the tax authorities)
4) Maintain Formulas OB98 (if needed, Like US and Japan need scaled basis calculation.)
5) The recipient categories
B. Master Data and Transactions
You need to specify in the vendor master record, a withholding tax code to enable the system to calculate the tax amount, which defaults when you enter a line item if the vendor is subject to withholding tax.
If a vendor is exempt from withholding tax, you must specify this in the master record the details of exemption certificate and the date up to which the exemption is valid. If an exemption exists, the system either posts no withholding tax or the reduced tax rate.
Withholding tax is only relevant for specific posting transactions in certain countries and even there, only for some groups of vendors. You therefore determine, depending on your company code, business partner, and the business transaction, the cases in which the fields for withholding tax become ready for input.
Regards,
Dareal
↧
