even if i can open the periods from jan to april ??
the point is that management wants to see depreciation expense over all periods, accumulating 5 months in one would represent unfair expenses
even if i can open the periods from jan to april ??
the point is that management wants to see depreciation expense over all periods, accumulating 5 months in one would represent unfair expenses
Hi Gaurav,
I am using the account assignment A and also had maintained the default asset class for AuC to the material group.
Not sure what I am missing. Please advise.
Thank you,
Inna
Boa tarde caros colegas.
Ao executarmos a transação FAGLGVTR notamos que as contas transitórias de encerramento apresentaram diferença de um exercício ao outro. Tínhamos anteriormente um saldo final "0" para o exercício de 2012 e "0" para o inicial de 2013. Após a execução da transação FAGLGVTR o saldo final de 2012 manteve-se em "0", porém, o saldo inicial de 2013 passou a ser R$ 53.000.000,00. Analisando a tabela FAGLFLEXT notamos que muitos lançamentos tiveram o valor transportado incorretamente para 2013, apresentando assim esta diferença na coluna de saldo inicial. Quando analisamos a tabela FAGLFLEXA temos o valor "ZERO".
Por favor, alguém teria a solução para este problema? Quando executamos a transação FAGLB03 para os lançamentos de encerramento no ledger 2L (utilizado para report fiscal) para 2013 o saldo de R$ 53.000.000,00 é apresentado, quando damos duplo clique para ver o relatório detalhado, temos um saldo "0".
Agradeço desde já o apoio.
Abraços!
Hi,
You have the option to do Depreciation "Repeat run" for closed periods, however you will have to open the periods first.
Also, do the test run first to avoid any other issue.
Regards,
Gaurav
Hi Ameen,
Even CAPEX budgeting can be achieved through Funds Management.
While creating the Purchase Order, Fund Center can be derived either from the Plant or Material Code (Depending on the Co's Requirement) and it can be achieved.
If you are using the Cost Object for Budgeting, the Material Stock would not be reflected in Inventory instead it would be as consumption.
I would suggest to leverage Funds Management even for CAPEX Procurement.
Thanks.
BR, Jaymin R. Bhatt
My issue was solved by choosing option 2 in this document. That was a big relief and I thought I should share it for others benefit:
Correcting Trip Status from backend under Travel Management during Exceptional Circumstances
Regards
Moazzam
Hello,
This is regarding the search string mapping for electronic bank statement. The standard search string configuration looks at the text after the : (colon) and maps to the target, is there a way to configure so that it looks at the text before the : (colon) and maps to the target?
Regards
Priya
Hi Paolo,
Is the transaction FEBA / FEBAN that you are looking for? Both the said transaction can do Post Processing of Bank Statement.
BR, Jaymin R. Bhatt
Hi Moazzam,
Execute T. Code SCU3 and enter the table (TCURR) it will give you the change log.
BR, Jaymin R. Bhatt
I am not aware of any standard SAP config where you can determine paying company code based on the payment methods but you could try to configure payment methods C & D to company code XX only.
Regards,
Priya
Hi Luiz,
Yes, all the configuration for the WHT were done as required by the note 1706309, including the assignation to the company code. Unfortunately, WTH Type is being populated, but WHT Code no, take a look to a document created today:
Doc. created right now, through VF01, below you can see the item, the WHT Data, information from the header of the document and the Customer Master Data of WHT for CCode BR21:
Thank you very much for your response!
Paulo Rosa
Certified SAP FI Trainer / Consultant
Hello,
I see that for vendors to which payment advice is sent successfully exist in other company codes. I think they are extended to the new company code (company code for which payment advice note is not sent to few vendors). For vendors to which payment advice notes is not sent they are present only in one company code.
Also, I have compared the successful vendors with failure vendors in LFA1 table. I found that for successful vendors there is authorization group assigned in Control tab of vendor master. And there is no authorization group assigned in vendor master of failure vendors. Could absence of authorization group might be the reason for payment advice note not being sent.
many thanks in advance
Hi Tushar,
Check if Note 681538 may be helpful for you.
Regards,
Sudhakar*
Hello Nisha,
Maybe you can check on the following couple things -
1. Is the payment advice output based on payment method? Maybe all the unsuccessful vendors are falling under the same payment method and that payment method is not config to send out payment advice.
2. If you have customized payment advice form then check with ABAPer if there is some coding to exclude certain set of vendors.
3. Check your spool log, it usually writes to spool with any error messages.
Regards,
Priya
Dear sirs;
I have the same situation I need one payment note or check for Multiple vendors and one alternate payee. Could you please help with that I can not use head office-branch function.
Thanks in advance,
Thanks Jaymin
That gives only the particulars of changes. If there is no change in the rate originally entered, it doesn't show anything for that rate while the rates I'm looking into were just entered once and never changed by anyone.
Hello;
I am traying to get on payment document (check) for multiple vendors with same altern payee from F110. I created one grouping key "02" and assigned it the vendor and master data was updated with alternate payee but it did not work.
Thank you very much!!!
If an entry was created and never changed, then you can see the type as 'created' in the same changes log path :
Or you can follow the below process:
Go to AUT10, press F9, enter the date range and enter the table as 'TCURR' and table field 'KEY'
Then execute. You can able to find these all entries which were inserted
Hi All while doing BRS manual in FF67 system is not clearing to the main bank GL though we have maintain in FBZP in house bank main GL system is posting to the sub account while payment in F110 that is correct but in FF67 not uploading data as well sm35 please help