Hello Pranav,
Check if the same entires are reflecting in the report J1INMIS
Though you are passing a manual JV, please be note that the "Section code" should be updated while posting.
Check and let us know if it helps
Thanks
↧
Re: TDS report not fetch the value.
↧
Re: Exchange differences in partial payment transactions
Hello Andrea,
In order to post FX Loss/Gain on partial payments, please activate the below configuration.
SPRO ->Financial Accounting (New) ->Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) ->Global Parameters for Company Code->Currencies ->Indicate Currency Differences for Partial Payments
For Customers, you can select DZ and for Vendors, you may have multiple but KZ, ZP.....etc.
Hope this helps
↧
↧
Re: Non Sequential Checks - Not Picked at F-58
As Sachin said, you can use Non-sequential checks when you want to issue the checks out of SAP and update through FCH5.
In order to post a non-sequential check, you need to create a new check lot in FCHI by checking the box "Non sequential" so that you can use this.
Thanks
↧
Re: Post Icon in FV50,FV60,FV70,FV65,FV75
Try to capture that screen as well in the screen variant.
Regards,
sridevi
↧
Re: header text
Hello Sai,
It seems you are working with report painter report.
If yes, you can go to GRR2. Select the Header data from Menu bar -> Report -> Header text
Here, you can delete / add a new variable which you want by clicking on the Variable
Let us know if you still see any issue
↧
↧
Re: Change payment advice printing program
Hello Pedro,
FBZP -> Pmnt methods in country
If you want to use PMW, then you can assign the Z / Standard program of RFFOAVIS_FPAYM. Based on this program, the variant displays the parameters in F110 - Printout / Media tab.
You can copy the standard program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM and do required changes with your naming convention.
Try this
Thanks
↧
Re: ICR - Process 002 - SPL blocked for direct posting
Hi Nathalie,
Sorry I don't have a customizing document with screenshots.
But I can help you with the confug steps,you can try them out and revert back if you face any issue.
I would also suggest you to follow the IMG description given at the node : Define Ledger.
Please follow the step below :
Step 1: Define Ledger (tcode GCL1) (Prerequites is to activated the global ledger in the transaction GCVO)
The ledger must have the following settings:
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Summary table | FBICRC002T |
| Ledger posting allowed | Yes |
| Write lines items | Yes |
| Transaction currency | Yes |
All other switches must be off.
Step 2 : Click "assign Company Codes"
Assign all your company code you wan to bring into the reconciliation system.
Step 3: Click "assign activities"
Assign at least activity RFBU (Write line items: Yes) and the field movement created in the previous step. You may want to assign the same activities as GL using functionAcitivities Like G/L and adjust the suggestions according to your requirements.
Click on "activities like G/L"
This is promptly ask for field movement,press F4 and create a new field movement type, it can also be alternately created using Tcode - GCF1
Please maek sure Posting indicator is set to 3 and Required Posting is unchecked for making subsequent postings.
Step 4 : Create Field Movement Type
- Set up and assign a field movement which will populate fields with discrepant field names. You should create the following entries for your field movement:
Receiver field Sender table Sender field DOCDT ACCIT_GLX BLDAT RACCT ACCIT_GLX ALTKT RASSC ACCIT_GLX VBUND REFNR ACCIT_GLX XBLNR - If you are not using a corporate chart of accounts you may want to use sender field HKONT for receiver field RACCT.
Step 5:Click "Ledger Selection"
In this ledger selection, you should also exclude any account types that are not to be reconciled.
If you want ot inclued GL postings with Trading partner and exclude the Vendor and Customer Invoices, you can use this rule :
ACCIT_GLX-VBUND <> '' AND ACCIT_GLX-KOART <> 'K' AND
ACCIT_GLX-KOART <> 'D' AND BSEG-XOPVW = '‘
In the step Companies to be Reconciled, make sure you are using the newly created SPL as the recieving and Sending Ledger.
Dependencies
If you are not implementing the Intercompany Reconciliation process at the beginning of a new year, you have to subsequently post existing documents (TCode – GCU1N) for this ledger. Otherwise only documents that are posted after the activation of the ledger will be included in the reconciliation process.
Please try out the above steps at your end.
Kindly revert if your face any issue.
Best Regards,
Ravi
↧
Re: 1099 Misc Reporting
You might try report S_P00_07000134. If you have set up 1099 related configuration, this report will list all 1099 vendors.
↧
Re: Issue on Clearing Vendor Open Items - F-44
Hi Marssel!!
Below the answer (That serves for you) that I've sent to Gavin. He has gave me the same tip about the notes.
Every help that you informed for me, except the notes, I've checked and are ok.
Looking the note 136754 I've believed have found out the solution: All documents out of T.code F-44 have the field BKPF-XSTOV (Reversal flag) = X, (The document was flagged for reversal).
To resolve that the note recommend: "Only if you cancel the reversal
flag, can you clear the document again. You can do this by removing
the planned date for the reverse posting (BKPF-STODT) in the document
header using Transaction FB02 (Change document)."
But analysing the documents the date for the reverse posting is not filled out.
Now I'm in this point: Manualy I had deleted the flag in BKPF-XSTOV and performed F-44. Unfortunately the document is not shown on list.
Thanks!
Regards!
↧
↧
Re: Issue on Clearing Vendor Open Items - F-44
Hi Gavin!!
First thanks for help me.
Every help that you informed for me, except the notes, I've checked and are ok.
Analyzing the note 152813 everything informed is ok.
But looking the note 136754 I've believed have found out the solution: All documents out of T.code F-44 have the field BKPF-XSTOV (Reversal flag) = X, (The document was flagged for reversal).
To resolve that the note recommend: "Only if you cancel the reversal
flag, can you clear the document again. You can do this by removing
the planned date for the reverse posting (BKPF-STODT) in the document
header using Transaction FB02 (Change document)."
But analysing the documents the date for the reverse posting is not filled out.
Now I'm in this point: Manualy I had deleted the flag in BKPF-XSTOV and performed F-44. Unfortunately the document is not shown on list.
Thanks again!
↧
Re: Sales process in Austria
Hello.
I need second option.
Thx.
↧
Re: What is "HO, USA, GA" in the Chart of Accounts?
You mentioned that your organization has been on SAP for a while now. Do you really want to change the account descriptions at this time? If you really do need to, t codes FS00 and FS02 are the ones that you need, but they bring up only one account at a time. For mass change, t code MASS can be used. When you are in MASS, you need to select master data (chart of accounts level) object, as descriptions are at the chart of accounts level (SKAT).
↧
Re: Company code created by mistake in existing system
Hi Hitesh,
I believe the above issue is in Production wherein you have transported the Transport Request (TR)etc.
Please check the tables updated in TR through SE09. Review all that tables for BUKRS = Company Code.
Secondly, check number range objects in NRIV table sub object = company code or tcode SNRO for the object.
The above is if the TRs are transported to Production.
Regards
Firoz Sayed
↧
↧
FBCJ Issues?
Dear All,
Can anybody explain some points in FBCJ (Cash Journal)
Explain with examples & screen shots
1. Transfer Cash from 1 Profit Center to another Profit Center?
2. Transfer Cash to Bank?
3. Self cheque given to withdraw Cash from bank for Petty cash transactions? where should maintain check no.....whether it pick from check lots?
4. Balance Petty cash deposited into Bank
5. Why Document splitting used? how it is used in FBCJ
6. Purpose of Check receipt where this checks updated, whether it is used for vendor or customers in FBCJ ---- Pls provide screen shots
7. What is Cash thereof in FBCJ?
Thanks
Anil
↧
Re: Customer Closing balance day-wise
Dear All,
Thanks for your suggestions.
I am closing this thread now.
↧
Re: Exchange Rate Values issue in SAP
Hello Srikanth,
Are we considering the OBBS setting here or it is not relevant?
Pls correct me, if I am wrong.
Rgds,
Vijay
↧
Segregation of duties for f_mandate
Hi there,
does anybody have experiences concerning segregation of duties concerning new SEPA authorization objects F_MANDATE?
As we are introducing SEPA now we also need to define possible conflicts.
Many thanks for all replies in advance!
Cheers,
Sandra
↧
↧
Re: Issue with authority check in FB70/75
Did you speak to your Security Team?
↧
Re: FBZP?
You have to change Home Bank code.
↧
Re: Payment block A
Hello,
Please go to the vendor master (T code FK02) and in payment transactions tab you will see in the payment block tab entered with indicator A, Please remove the indicator A and put it as free for payment.
Regards,
Saju
↧