Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials
Viewing all 8906 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: F110 - Clearing Down Payment with Invoice


Cash Discounts -- are there only 2 methods?

$
0
0

Are there only 2 ways to take a cash discount?

 

We want Invoices paid reduced by the cash discount.  However, we want the cash discount taken to credit the original purchases account.

Example:  100 invoice with 2% 10 day, net 30.

Invoice posted as a credit to vendor for 100 and a debit to account xxxxxxxxxx for 100.

On day 10, invoice is paid.  We want to debit vendor 100, credit account xxxxxxxxxx for 20 and credit cash for 80.

 

From what I am reading, You can either post cash discounts in the payment run, and post the discount amount to 1 'purchase discount taken' account.

--OR--

you can post cash discount at time of posting the invoice, but if the invoice is paid late and the discount is lost, the lost discount goes to 1 'purchase discount lost' account.

Re: F110 - Clearing Down Payment with Invoice

$
0
0

Thank´s Pretti.

 

Rodrigo take a look at 164835 - F110: Clearing credit memos and invoices.

Credit management - How does setting in AKOF work

$
0
0

Hi gurus

 

We are facing some difficulites with credit check in SAP. We defined credit control area 1000 and linked id to company code 1000. Additionaly, we defined, which reconciliation accounts are to be excluded from credit check and also defined which special G/L indicators are not to be taken in consideration.

As this project was started some time ago, than abandoned and now stared again, we did some settings few years ago (credit contol area, few accounts in TAKOF) and some (accounts in TAKOF, special G/L indicators)  only recently.

 

Now we have problem as the system takes into consideration with oldest item documents, which  shouldn't be included into credit check and so some customers are blocked because of this.

 

I'm trying to figure out, how the system checks accounts excluded in TAKOF. can anybody explain, please?

 

Meti

Re: FC

$
0
0

Hi Erwin,

 

I just had a comparison of two similar documents and noticed that there is a field difference. The field is ''Rate for Taxes'', where the  rate showing is 1 for the problematic document. That somehow indicates, the document is intervened manually and the settings for company code allows it. Where as this thing is not there with the other document.

 

Any thought?

 

Regards

Partha


Re: F110 - FTP Specifications, File Specifications

$
0
0

Hi Claudia,

 

What is the file format that we are referring to? For example in UK, it is BACS, in US it is ACH. Like in your country, what is the generally accepted file format. Most of the banks usually accepts that general file format.

 

Look at OBPM1 and SAP has provided standard PMW structures for majority file formats or country. I do not think this is not a rocket science. Bank should be able to give the file format they would accept for payments.

 

If the technical team is not able to provide the answers to your questions, you should ask your cleint.

 

How is the current payments are made other than cheque?

 

You need to be more specific regarding,

 

Bank Name

Country

File Format

 

People would be able to advise you what needs to be done.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Kind Regards,

Ravi

Re: DMEE - XML node vanished

$
0
0

Hi, the application is BFIBL02. Then you can configure it.

Re: Not able to cancel a Purchase invoice using Tcode MR8M

$
0
0

Hi,

 

  The cause for the error is the inconsistent posting line item for the creditor line item.

  In subroutine CHECK_SHKZG (program SAPLFACI) the system checks the debit credit indicator of the posting line items.

  Please check the internal table ACCIT_FI (fields KOSTL, KOART and SHKZG) for your custom invoice.

  Although the creditor amount has a negative sign the debit credit indicator (SHKZG) is 'S' (DEBIT). For a negative amount the system expects 'H' (Credit) instead of 'S' (Debit).

  Because of this inconsistency the error message F5 704 'Inconsistent amounts' is issued.

 

  Also, normally the message F5704 appears in simulation or posting process because system tries to distribute the skonto amount to each invoice items (either reference to PO, to G/L account or to material).

 

Regards,

Cristiano


Re: Attachment does not support while trying to open

$
0
0

Check this sap note:

 

1442303 - SAP GUI 7.20 - replacement of SAPWORKDIR

 

Also, can you see the file in the path Windows indicate?

 

Cristiano

Re: Cash Management issue payment block

Re: Customer Tolerance for Clearing

Re: F110 - FTP Specifications, File Specifications

$
0
0

Ravi, which my FTP server? I don't have my own FTP server. This should be bank's FTP server - there is automated system in the background of FTP processing those files. The purpose is that bank receives this payment request file. If I added it to my own FTP, which I don't have, then this file would never come to the bank.

 

There is no ''bank portal'' / ''software''. Not sure what are you referring to.

 

Those are all my bankers, and many more. I haven't listed every single bank I contacted. Just today I contacted 5 more. In average I consumed half hour per one bank, spoke with employees in different departments. Today was the same story as every other day - noone knows anything about that. I was told an answer that they don't know what ''FTP'' is. Then I somehow managed to get email address from someone in technical department. I sent him sample of file. He told me he has never seen anything like that in 10+ years career on this job position. I promise this is the truth, I have no reason to lie.

 

Even if I use MT103 file format, I still need remaining details:

 

file type (file extension)

file layout (you probably meant ''file layout'' is BACS, ACH)

file standard

ftp path (ftp folder)

ftp login credentials (if required - sometimes ftp path isn't behind the login access)

 

I repeat: my problem is all about obtaining such needed and required details for DMEE / F110. Just obtaining them so someone (bank employee) could send them to me. Noone understands what I want, this is the problem.

Re: Post Goods Receipt, Post goods issue in Second local currency issue (differences)

Re: F110 - FTP Specifications, File Specifications

$
0
0

Claudia

 

I think that you are not following Ravi's advice although he has listed them in each paragraph. I believe that what you are experiencing is not a technical issue. It is a procedural issue and you probably need to escalate it with your own Team or Manager. It is understandable that one is frustrated when one does not get the information required to complete the task. And to achieve what you want, you may have to change the approach.

 

Ravi's point is very clear and that is  - the Banks are not your clients but your vendors banks. So you need to contact your vendor to get the information you require because the vendors would have an agreement with their banks for online payments/transactions. Secondly, in order to get such information, Banks will have their own policies and no employee is authorized to just answer you or give you information without a proper procedure in place. There has to be some protocol that is followed before information is transferred. Also, the people you ask for this sort of information can only go through the IT department after they have clearance from their legal department. Just calling up people in the Bank and expecting them to know about file formats and file transfers is not a feasible approach.

 

These questions from Ravi start with the basics and they need to be answered first. But like I said, there is a protocol that is followed and the only contacts to get this information can be from the IT department for the Bank or Vendors.

 

a) Would you accept online payments to our vendors? Yes or No

b) If the answer to question a) is Yes, then what is the file format. ________

c) If you have the file format, please can you provide a sample copy / guide of the file format.

d) What is the way to submit our files to make the payments?

Profitability Segment Being Derived Again- Msg No-KI350

$
0
0

Dear experts,

 

While doing the MIRO i am getting the following issue.

 

We are doing normal PO(Purchase order), then MIGO. After that we are doing MIRO. At this time we are getting the this issue. I have check KEDR. In that Plant and BA is there. In MIRO this is not allowing to post the Doc. But in QAS system this is working fine. In PRD not working.

 

Please provide the Solution

 

Thanks in Advance

 

MIRO.jpg

MIRO.jpg


Re: F110 - FTP Specifications, File Specifications

$
0
0

Hi Claudia,

 

To clarify further, we have recently implemented MT103 file format for our international payments. We have our vendors in more than 100 countries and the transfers goes to thousands of banks all over the world. We never contacted any of the banker of our Vendors. Our Single Point of contact is the technical team of our bank only. Our bankers are one of the leading bankers in UK. Having said that all major banks would accept MT103 file format. Fortunately, SAP has provided PMW structure readily available, we only need to tweak it little bit suitable to our purpose.

 

May be our approach is helpful to you.

 

a) MT103 file format file to be created through F110 - We have done only Standard Configuration - OBPM1 / OBPM3 / FBZP / OBPM4

 

b) Place the files in the secured FTP folder - This is done when you execute F110 (as the file paths are maintained in OBPM4). These files are stored in one of our secured folder.

 

c) Our banker has given access to their banking portal. Our payments team login to that bank portal and submit the file. If there are any errors on the file, the banking portal gives the errors for that particular payment and we have option to correct them manually before submit to the bank. Mostly 99 percent of the payments will go through first time.

 

Please note there is no mechanism that file are transmitted directly from SAP to bank. This is NOT going to happen. Generation of the file to a folder is end of SAP Job. Then manually, you need to submit the file to the bank.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Kind Regards,

Ravi

Re: Consolidating IDocs generated through RFFOEDI1 program

$
0
0

Hi Vishal,

 

Even i am facing the same issue to consolidate the idoc at payment method level.

 

Did you achieve it.

 

Thanks

VP

Re: F.13 Auto Clearing for Intercompany OB74

$
0
0

Hi Preeti,

 

We have not checked the box as you mentioned.

 

Any other things missing ?

 

thanks

VP

Error M8147 about the T030 table and ANL key in OBYD

$
0
0

Hello everyone,

 

I need transfer the special stock between PEP (Project stock). I was using the movement type 415 Q, but occurred the error.

 

 

 

 

Account determination for entry 2000 ANL 0002 ___ 1300 not possible

 

 

 

Message No. M8147

Diagnosis

 

 

 

The system did not find an account for this transaction. This means that the account determination for key 2000 ANL 0002 ___ 1300 is not maintained in MM Customizing (Valuation). The key is made up of:Chart of account Transaction key (= Posting transaction) Valuation grouping code Account grouping code Valuation class

System Response

 

 

 

The system cannot update a G/L account for this transaction. You cannot post the transaction.

Procedure

 

 

 

Contact your system administrator.

 

 

If you have the authorization, check the Account determination in Customizing for Valuation.

 

 

Proceed

Note

 

 

 

The relevant posting transaction can be found in Table T030A.

 

 

 

 

My question is, in the TCODE OBYD isn't impossible the insert the account, and the OBYC doesn't exist this key.

 

 

If you had a any information or sugestion for this scenario, please let me know.

 

 

 

 

Thanks all.

 

 

Aislan Botelho

Re: F110 - Wrong Copy Paramiters

$
0
0

Hi Mauro,

 

Are the documents from the new proposal the same as from the old one ?

 

If you regenerate the Payment Medium, do you get the same result ?

 

Kind Regards

Viewing all 8906 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>